Longtime campaign spending limits violate First Amendment, Supreme Court says

by Summer Lane

Photo: Alamy

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a slate of high-profile rulings, including an opinion dealing with the flow of money in political campaigns.

In a key decision for National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, the high court nixed a federal rule that previously restricted a political party’s spending in coordination with an individual candidate. The justices ruled 6-3.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in writing for the majority opinion, stated, “We likewise agree with plaintiffs and now hold that FECA’s limits on political parties’ coordinated expenditures violate the First Amendment.”

FECA is the Federal Election Campaign Act (1971). In their decision on Tuesday, the justices overturned a 2001 SCOTUS decision that upheld expenditure limits, challenged by then-Senatorial candidate J.D. Vance and three other lawmakers in 2022, SCOTUSblog reported.

“To uphold the political-party coordinated-expenditure limits here could therefore help consign political parties to continued second-tier status as compared to outside groups,” Kavanaugh wrote.

He continued, “Weakened political parties distort the political system. And in the views of many, the relatively diminished political parties have ushered in increased political polarization and fragmentation. For that reason, many who generally support campaign finance restrictions have called for elimination of the political-party coordinated-expenditure limits.”

Politico reported that Tuesday’s decision was largely a win for Republicans as the 2026 midterm elections rapidly approach.

“It will allow all political parties—including the DNC and RNC and the respective Senate and House campaign committees, as well as other parties and party committees—to participate more freely and compete more fully in the political process, and to coordinate more closely with their candidates,” Kavanaugh wrote in the opinion conclusion.

President Trump wasted no time in celebrating the court’s decision on Tuesday.

“The Supreme Court just took restrictions off political spending!” he wrote on Truth Social, reacting to the ruling.

He added, “A BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS and, more importantly, The First Amendment!”

Competing political power players remained critical, however,

“The Supreme Court today made a corrupt campaign finance system even worse,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wrote on X. “The Court struck down limits on the coordination between candidates and political parties, giving billionaires even more power. Billionaires buying elections is not democracy. It’s Oligarchy.”

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair Kirsten Gillibrand, and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Suzan DelBene released a joint statement on Tuesday rebutting the decision from SCOTUS. “Today’s ruling is a win for billionaire donors and special interests who want more influence over the GOP agenda and an invitation for corruption,” they claimed.

You may also like