Trump files scathing Eighth Amendment-based argument against AG James’ impossible bond condition

2CT828M United States President Donald J. Trump speaks to reporters as he departs the White House for a rally in Ohio, on Monday, September 21, 2020 in Washington DC. Credit: Kevin Dietsch/Pool via CNP /MediaPunch

Photo: Alamy

As a foreboding March 25 deadline looms on the horizon in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $454 million civil fraud suit, President Trump has filed a scathing response to a half-billion-dollar bond appeal.

An official statement the president’s campaign announced on Thursday, “President Donald J. Trump has filed a powerful response to Racist and Corrupt New York AG Letitia James’ and Democrat Club-controlled Judge Arthur Engoron’s crooked, political Witch Hunt, specifically their Unconstitutional, Illegal bond demand.”

The filing was detailed but succinct, clocking in at five pages, and was addressed directly to the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court.

On Monday, New York AG James could potentially move to seize Trump’s assets in the Empire State if he does not post bond, which has been set at nearly the same amount as the $454 million fine.

Trump all Vivek Ramaswamy rails against NY AG Letitia James

“It would be completely illogical—and the definition of an unconstitutional Excessive Fine and a Taking—to require Defendants to sell properties at all, and especially in a ‘fire sale,’ in order to be able to appeal the lawless Supreme Court judgment, as that would cause harm that cannot be repaired once the Defendants do win, as is overwhelmingly likely, on appeal,” the filing argued.

This argument is based upon the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

Trump’s attorneys strongly argued that “demanding an undertaking in the full amount of the judgment in order to appeal, the Attorney General and Supreme Court have sought to impose a patently unreasonable, unjust, and unconstitutional” bond condition.

Per RSBN, Trump has thus far been unable to secure the multi-million-dollar bond amount needed before Monday. James could immediately begin seizing his assets in New York if he fails to post bond.

Related posts

Do you believe there were only 26 FBI informants at the Capitol on Jan 6th | D&S – 12/12/24

‘Waste, fraud, and abuse’: Trump details big 2025 plans

MAHA: Trump commits to backing RFK Jr. on a major health issue that is possibly linked to vaccines

1 comment

Peter Chavez March 22, 2024 - 12:33 pm
This blog post is worth the read - trust us!
Add Comment